The notorious Roger Ver is again within the headlines for all of the improper causes. Like many gamers within the trade, the derivatives trade CoinFLEX not too long ago bumped into monetary bother. Surprisingly, they blamed all of it on Roger Ver and the circus began. Fortunately for us, Chinese language journalist Colin Wu lined “the whole insider particulars by a supply near the state of affairs” in his e-newsletter. Nonetheless, as you’ll be able to see, it’s an nameless supply. So, take the story we’re about to investigate with a grain of salt.
The abstract of the state of affairs in keeping with Wu:
“On June 24, 2022, the trade CoinFLEX introduced that it made the choice to halt person withdraws, and the worth of the platform Token FLEX subsequently plummeted, from $4.30 to lower than $1.50 in 4 hours. On the identical time, FlexUSD, the platform’s stablecoin, additionally started to de-peg, with costs dropping as little as $0.23.”
The humorous factor is that each entities had been clearly in enterprise collectively. On Might 14th, Roger Ver tweeted, “Curiosity paying FlexUSD by CoinFLEX is on its strategy to being the default secure coin for the entire SmartBCH ecosystem if USDT & USDC don’t transfer rapidly.” How did all the pieces deteriorate so quick? That’s what this text’s about.
Curiosity paying #FlexUSD by @CoinFLEXdotcom is on its strategy to being the default secure coin for the entire @SmartBCH ecosystem if #USDT & #USDC don’t transfer rapidly.https://t.co/HG14Ik6U0o
— Roger Ver (@rogerkver) Might 14, 2022
Roger Ver Vs. CoinFLEX, The Play By Play
The story begins with CoinFLEX saying to their companions that they “opened a particular account for Roger Ver.” The account’s traits assured that Roger Ver “wouldn’t be liquidated instantly if it fell under the upkeep margin, however relatively that he could be given adequate time to make a margin name.” Nothing particular right here, the person is a high-net-worth particular person, offers like this are a dime a dozen in excessive finance.
As a assure, Roger Ver supplied “a margin of BCH,” valued “at round $400.” Then, the Terra collapse occurred and the entire crypto market crashed. By the point CoinFLEX ”confronted a liquidity disaster,” Bitcoin Money was value round $120. It’s nonetheless at that worth vary on the time of writing. That is the place issues get insane. The largest revelation of Wu’s story is on the finish of this paragraph.
“If that had been all, CoinFLEX would have been capable of cowl its shortfall. Nonetheless, previous to this, CoinFLEX had issued its personal stablecoin, FlexUSD, like different exchanges. At this level, CoinFLEX used FlexUSD to purchase a considerable amount of FLEX from the secondary market and opened quick place to hedge the spot worth. Nonetheless, the counterparty to this quick place was additionally Roger Ver!”
As we’ve seen occur time and again, “when the withdrawal restriction announcement was made, CoinFLEX’s whole funds started to fall in a cyclical vogue.” And all hell broke unfastened.
BCH worth chart on Coinbase | Supply: BCH/USD on TradingView.com
An All-Out Twitter Battle
On June twenty seventh, the corporate’s CEO Mark Lamb tweeted, “CoinFLEX made the choice to halt person withdrawals on June 23, shortly after a long-time buyer of CoinFLEX went into detrimental fairness. ” Instantly after, the rumor that Roger Ver was that “long-time buyer” started circulating.
Just lately some rumors have been
spreading that I’ve defaulted on a
debt to a counter-party. These rumors
are false. Not solely do I not have a debt
to this counter-party, however this counter-
get together owes me a considerable sum of
cash, and I’m at the moment looking for the
return of my funds.
— Roger Ver (@rogerkver) June 28, 2022
The Bitcoin Money chief went on the offensive and tweeted a press release clearly written by a lawyer. “Just lately some rumors have been spreading that I’ve defaulted on a debt to a counter-party. These rumors are false. Not solely do I not have a debt to this counter-party, however this counter-party owes me a considerable sum of cash, and I’m at the moment looking for the return of my funds.” How might these two statements be true? Keep in mind that “the counterparty to this quick place was additionally Roger Ver!”
He had an extended monitor report of beforehand topping up margin and assembly margin necessities in accordance with this settlement. We’ve got been talking to him on calls ceaselessly about this case with the goal of resolving it. We nonetheless wish to resolve it.
— Mark Lamb 💪 (@MarkDavidLamb) June 28, 2022
Nonetheless, Mark Lamb was not having it. Despite the fact that each events had been negotiating, Lamb took to Twitter and acknowledged, “CoinFLEX additionally categorically denies that we’ve got any money owed owing to him.” Plus, “Roger Ver owes CoinFLEX $47 Million USDC. We’ve got a written contract with him obligating him to personally assure any detrimental fairness on his CoinFLEX account and prime up margin recurrently.”
Even when CoinFLEX is correct on this occasion, did they need to air their soiled laundry in public?
Roger Ver Vs. CoinFLEX, The Aftermath
Again to Colin Wu’s e-newsletter:
“Ultimately, Roger Ver’s place was fully worn out and became detrimental fairness, whereas CoinFLEX was left with numerous delisting FLEX. It was revealed that CoinFLEX had an actual lack of $120 million, together with losses from the de-peg of the stablecoin FlexUSD and the lack of withdrawals (lower than $10 million) because of the collapse of the SmartBCH cross-chain bridge, which was constructed by CoinFLEX.”
And the actual fact of the matter is that, even when Roger Ver’s debt brought about this, CoinFLEX’s danger administration crew has just a few inquiries to reply. “Roger Ver grew to become nearly the one counterparty to the trade, and this solely counterparty had the privilege of not replenishing the margin in time,” Wu concludes. It was an unlucky sequence of occasions, however each events signed these offers and each events took to Twitter to resolve what ought to’ve been a non-public matter.
Disgrace throughout.
Featured Picture by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay | Charts by TradingView
